Joe Ryan

Independent

For Congress in 2010

Joe Ryan is an Independent Candidate for California's 52nd Congressional District Seat

Neo-conservatives & Neo-liberals are aggressively challenging America's loyal-citizenry in an all-out battle for America's future. It's Democrat & Republican Party traitors versus the rest of us, with the constitution and the rule of law hanging in the balance. JR

This Candidate DOES NOT Accept Money from anyone!

E-Mail Joe Ryan

Call 1-877-563-1116

THE ISSUES

Why Joe Ryan is Running! By Joe Ryan

 

Let's Get some misconceptions out of the way and then I'll Proceed to explain in depth, Why I am running for Congress against Duncan Hunter jr. and Mike Lumpkin.

 

* I realize my odds of beating the two major party candidates, while simultaneously refusing to accept money, are not short. Ever heard the saying, "it's not always about winning; it's about how you play the game"? Winning is great, and I would like to win. I'll go all-out to win,; but how I'm playing the game (refusing to accept money or run an expensive campaign) will hopefully send a message to somebody (my opponents or the public).

 

* I realize I may be ignored by the media since they have established bizarre, anti-democratic guidelines for who they interview, cover, or allow into debates and other forums. In the media's eyes, not raising or spending money equates to strike one & two against the legitimacy of my campaign; and I've understood that fact from the start. Doesn't make me happy; but I understand how the game of politics is played in our corrupted culture.

 

* I realize I may be mocked by some people who don't understand what I'm trying to accomplish, appreciate what I'm doing, or have disdain for my efforts. That's not a big deal, or something I lose sleep over.

 

* I realize some people will have disdain for my campaign because they will presume - that my run for office at the congressional level - indicates I think I am a bigshot, or a know-it-all. In fact, while I have a broad range of knowledge about many issues and matters related to politics and my business's product-lines, I have never considered myself smarter than my neighbors, co-workers, or other people I meet every day in the East County. Everyone has their specialty, and I do believe I have a better understanding of some political issues than some people who do not study those type of matters in-depth. My law degree took a lot of work and studying, and it sets me up to be a better congressman than my opponents (without law degrees); but, 90% of our population could make it through law school too. I earned a law degree because I made getting a degree a priority, and I was fortunate that some other things worked out to make getting my degree attainable. It doesn't prove I'm smarter than someone who specializes in building bridges, or managing a store. Nonetheless, with my law degree and life experience, I'm much better suited to serving in congress than most people, who are just as smart or smarter than myself, but who have concentrated their studies in areas not related to the law or politics.

 

WHY I'M RUNNING:

 

* I'm better qualified for the job than the candidates from the democratic and Republican parties. Both major party candidates have served honorably in the military; however, collectively, they have almost zero experience in non-military related matters. I'll concede that having some military experience could be helpful for a prospective congressional candidate, but I don't see any indication that either understands globalism or how the US military is being misused and the soldiers abused in pursuit of insane neo-con fantasies disguised as sound foreign policy.

 

* Perhaps I would not be running if either Duncan Hunter jr, or Mike Lumpkin came out with an original thought, or if either decided to forsake big party politics-as-usual, and it's reliance on dirty-money. Instead we have the usual scenario; two major party candidates who are raising and spending money non-stop on consultants, semi-pointless signs, and big staffs; while they advocate politically safe positions that the polsters and party advisers sell them.

 

* I'm a message candidate, and my message is worthy, regardless of my status or lack of name-recognition. I'm running on a platform that involves trying to remove the influence of money from politics. I plaster, 'this candidate does not accept money' anywhere I can get a little exposure, because it shocks some people into thinking about the possibility of accepting a concept (politicians running for office without raising money) that has been buried far from the belief centers of our brains. Yet, how hard is it to rebel against the democratic party and republican party by simply voting for the candidate who does not accept money, in every election, until all politicians are forced to play by our new rules. It just takes the willpower of 40% of the voters to change politics in the 52nd district. I'm a raging optimist who actually believs in the mental strength of the American people, and I believe they will eventually realize that the two major parties rae the enemy, instead of their beloved team.

 

* The percentage of voters who have given up on the republicans and democrats has risen to almost 25% of the registered voters (in the 52nd district), yet if I hadn't run for the 52nd district seat, their would be no person representing anything other than major party viewpoints. Mike Benoit (a libertarian) is running too; however, I do not believe he has a coherent plan for advancing America, other than claiming he's the 'Ron Paul' candidate', and mimicking everything Ron Paul says and believes. I admire Ron Paul, but some of his ideas play into the hands of the globalist (like returning to the gold standard). Returning to the gold standard is better than letting the fed issue fiat money; however, it is not an equitable solution to our money-origination problems, considering the globalist crime syndicate has most of the world's gold stored in the central banks they own around the world.

 

 

* Another reason I'm running is because I want to advertise the fact that our nation is at a critical juncture in history; and that we must all come together soon against a common enemy (The Globalist Crime Syndicate) before they loot every one of us of our wealth and turn control of this nation over to foreign based investors. The process started a long time ago. It's a carefully executed plan that most Americans don't even know exists. It's not a conspiracy 'theory'. It's a fact of life that is detailed in a book written by Richard Haass (The President of the council on Foreign Relations), titled, The Opportunity, America's moment to alter history's course. You've never heard of the book because they didn't market the book to the public. It was a book by someone who thinks he's 'elite' for others who feel the same way about themselves. You can pick it up on Amazon for a penny or two (plus shipping). What's important about the book, besides the fact that it contains a blueprint for usurping the sovereignty of our country through massive entanglement, is the fact that the Globalist Crime Syndicate believes they can snuff out freedom for good and deliver all effective power to the insane persons Richard Haass refers to affectionately as the 'hereditary elites' by the year 2010. They believe that, if the American people can be brainwashed into inaction for just a couple more years, then they will have enough power, so that the citizens of any one nation (as well as all the citizens of the world) will be powerless to stop their accent to power. Free Trade agreements are the ticket to their success, yet freedom loving conservatives have been conned by tools on talk radio into believing that free trade agreements are about improving exports, when they are really about delivering all power to NGO's run by the globalist crime syndicate's leaders. Haass has an 'integration index' in the back of the book wherein the globalsit keep track of all the ways they have fooled us into ceding them power. You won't hear any of this from Duncan Hunter (whose Dad pays 20k a year to be a CFR member), or Mike Lumpkin (because the globalist OWN the democratic party, lock, stock, and barell); so I decide to fill an intellectual void, and join the race.

 

Health Care

Taxes and The IRS

Bribery, Buying Access

Media Propaganda

Fixing Social Security

Deficit Spending

The Federal Reserve Bank

Legal Profession Reform

Arnold Schwarnegger

Other Websites Joe Ryan created for Political Causes he Believes in, and to amplify ideas he has about how to get America back on track

OTHER PAGES FROM JoeryanForCongress.com

Messages From Joe Ryan to persons registered as Independents:

• VOTERS ABANDON DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND REPUBLICAN PARTY IN DROVES TO BECOME INDEPENDENTS: Voters are abandoning the two major parties in droves. In all 5 congressional Districts located within San diego County, Independent voters comprise 25-30% of the electorate. The San diego County Registrar has not updated their registration totals in 2009, so chances are independents comprise almost 1/3 of the voters in all 5 Socal Congressional districts at this time. By the time the next election is held, considering how the Democrats and Republicans are handling their political 'business', voters registered independent may comprise up to 35% of the voting electorate. That would put the independent registration on a par - countywide - with the two major parties.
• THE SDMEDIA IS TRYING TO KEEP INDEPENDENTS IN THE MAJOR PARTY'S FOLD: The SD media has dictated that Independents aren't 'serious' candidates. This allows the two major party's candidates to fight for the 'independent voters', just as if those voters never rejected their corrupt parties! The media has rigged the discourse, so there is no independent movement at all. The two major parties are conspiring with the media to manipulate elections. In other words, the media and operatives from the two major parties have partnered-up against independents.
• MINOR CANDIDATES = MAJOR SCARE FOR BIG BOYS FROM MAJOR PARTIES: With independent registration totals approaching 30% in the 52nd congressional district, the two major parties are very scared of any candidate, not matter how minor, who might affect a particular race, or get the independent movement rolling in San Diego County. If a candidate like Joe Ryan received just 1/2 of the total votes available from persons registered non-partisan, he would garner the votes of approximately 15% of the district's electorate; thus affecting the outcome of almost any close race between the two major party candidates. Don't you think the Democratic party leadership and the republican party leadership are aware of that fact? It's not about stopping a candidate like Joe Ryan from rising up to sweep the election ; instead it's all about stopping Joe Ryan or any other Independent from even getting a tiny fraction of the vote. Independent candidates - like Joe Ryan - represent the future, and the two major parties and the SD media don't like what they see in their crystal ball.
• WE NEED MORE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES RUNNING FOR EVERY MAJOR OFFICE, TO GATHER MOMENTUM FOR INDEPENDENTS & BECAUSE INDEPENDENTS CAN WIN IN 2010/2012: In 2008, Joe Ryan became perhaps the first candidate in over fifty years to run for a major political office - as an independent - in San Diego County. Considering that almost 1/3 of the electorate considers themselves 'Independents', that's very odd. Independents candidates wishing to participate in the political process have extremely high hurdles placed in their path, and they have to overcome the media's partnerships with the two major parties; Yet, that doesn't seem to completely explain why Independents NEVER run for office. There seems to be a reluctance to engage the two major parties that - in some cases - might only be explained by reference to the 'Stockholm Syndrome'. A lone Independent is easy for the SDMedia to ignore, but a coalition of Independents running for all 5 local, congressional-district seats would be hard to ignore. If an independent candidate has enough exposure so that his existence in the race is known to the majority of independent voters in his district, and if he does not alienate those voters to a substantial degree, an independent candidate can start the race with a base consisting of almost 1/3 of the electorate. Since a huge percentage of the Democratic and Republican Party's base is ready to abandon their gang at the drop-of-a-hat, but they remain unwilling to crossover and vote for the other, 'dark' side (the 'other major political party'), Independent candidates are perfectly positioned to steal away a large group of party stalwarts who are disgusted with their gang's crooked political shenanigans, and who are now inclined to vote Independent.
• VOTERS ARE TIRED OF THE PARTISAN, PARTY POLITICS DRIVEN BY CORRUPT FUNDING, AND THEY PROBABLY WILL NOT VOTE FOR 'INDEPENDENTS' WHO EMBRACE THE MONEY-MACHINE AND WHO ACT AS QUASI-DEMOCRATS, OR QUASI-REPUBLICANS: Why would a voter choose an independent candidate over someone from the major party they preferred in the past, if the Independent candidate acts just like a quasi-Democrat or quasi-Republican, or if they ignore the reason many voters are registering as 'Independents', and they grovel for money from corrupt lobbyist and contributors who do not have the District's best interest in mind. The term 'independent' certainly implies that a candidate with that label will think more 'independently' than a partisan who caters their views to their party's platform or their contributor's desires; but the term also implies an 'independence' from corrupt sources of political-cash. That's why I humbly suggest that any candidate running as an independent consider accepting as little money as possible from large contributors, and that they utilize a grass roots type of campaign that emphasizes their independent logic and their independence from corrupt sources of money.
• JOE RYAN IS OFFERING TECHINICAL SUPPORT AND PRACTICAL ADVICE TO INDEPENDENTS WHO WANT TO RUN FOR CONGRESS IN 2010: I do not claim to be an expert or a political consultant, however I did learn a few things in 2008 that may be helpful to anyone considering running as an Independent for Congress in 2010, and I am willing to share what I've learned with others who are contemplating a similar run. Contact me at the 'contact link' if you are interested in some support and advice.
• SNEAKY MAJOR PARTY OPPONENTS CLAIM TO BE 'INDEPENDENTS' NOW: I don't doubt that Duncan Hunter is a brave guy on the battlefield; however, Duncan is now ashamed of his party affiliation, and he is shamelessly running-away from his party label as fast as he can!!! Joe Ryan is the only Independent in the race! The Republicans and Democrats are the corrupt, criminal parties/gangs that are ruining this country, and the libertarian party has the burning-tire of their de-regulation philosophy tied around its political neck; So, I understand why my partisan, party opponents might want to deceive the voters now. So now, Duncan sheds his party label like a chameleon, as he proceeds to appropriate my statutory designation (independent), and he proceeds to make it his own. Duncan D. Hunter started calling himself "independent" two days after their Union-Tribune buddies hid the only real 'independent' in the race (me), from the public's view. That was convenient.
• THERE HE GOES AGAIN: Duncan Hunter (the Republican party candidate) sent out a multi-page flyer yesterday (9/30) where he used the words "independence", and "independent" over and over; but in four glossy pages, you cannot find the word 'republican'. His slick handlers even ended one page with the words, "Duncan is an Independent". Then on the next page it said "thinker, ...". Now, that was slick! 10/07 Reprise: Expensive, glossy mailers flood the district as Duncan Hunter sends out another mailer where he features the word Independent in big bold letters. Meanwhile, the word, 'republican' cannot be located anywhere in his campaign material.